RE: [-empyre-] hi from EFW

["Jim Andrews" <jim@vispo.com>]

To discuss it on the list is not to address the castle, though, Simon.
Though I think you have a good point in implicitly urging caution in what we
say. I think it's a good idea to get as much appropriate support as possible
for a collective statement. Here we are wondering how much to say on this
list given that a fellow artist is being accused in the 'war on terrorism'.
A sad state of affairs. I don't think we're in disagreement, Simon, and
thanks for clarifying.

ja

> Jim
>
> I wasn't suggesting that your approach was inappropriate - just updating
> people on an initiative elsewhere (which, whilst I support it, I am not
> directly involved in). In this instance I would support the principle of
> castle to castle. We are looking at a potentially significant penalty. I
> would never go to court without a lawyer.
>
> My instincts are with you, but realistically my judgement is elsewhere...
>
> Best
>
> Simon